Suchergebnisse
Filter
19 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Unresolved conflicts and shaming processes: risk factors for long-term sick leave for mental-health reasons
In: Nordic journal of Social Research: NJSR, Band 5, Heft 0
ISSN: 1892-2783
Unresolved conflicts and shaming processes: risk factors for long-term sick leave for mental-health reasons
In: Nordic journal of Social Research: NJSR, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 39-54
ISSN: 1892-2783
Gesundheit und soziale Ungleichheit: über Klasse, Armut und Krankheit
In: Armut im modernen Wohlfahrtsstaat, S. 403-420
"Als der schwedische Wohlfahrtsstaat vor Jahrzehnten aufgebaut wurde, sollte auch der Zusammenhang zwischen sozio-ökonomischen Faktoren und Krankheit bekämpft und unterbrochen werden. Die Lebenssituation der unteren Schichten konnte verbessert und die Kluft zwischen Wohlhabenden und Armen verringert werden. Im Mittelpunkt des Beitrags stehen Lebensumstände wie Ernährung, Unterkunft und Hygiene. Hat Schweden sein Ziel erreicht, sind sozio-ökonomische Einflüsse auf die Gesundheit unwichtig geworden? Die Untersuchung zeigt, daß etwa Arbeitslose und Unterstützungsempfänger im allgemeinen weniger gesund sind als andere Bevölkerungsgruppen. Sozio-ökonomische Faktoren erklären gesundheitliche Unterschiede zwischen den sozialen Gruppen. Sie tragen dazu bei, die Gesundheitssituation gesellschaftlicher Gruppen besser zu verstehen." (Autorenreferat)
Gesundheit und Soziale Ungleichheit
In: Armut im modernen Wohlfahrtsstaat, S. 403-420
Reflexive Serendipity. Grounded Theory and Serendipity in Disaster Management and Military Research
In: Qualitative sociology review: QSR, Band 12, Heft 3, S. 28-42
ISSN: 1733-8077
Grounded Theory (GT) is a research method that allows the researcher to make discoveries without a priori knowledge, and allows an open mind not an empty head. The use of this method is also desirable for serendipity to occur in the research process. This article therefore aims to chronologically present how serendipity has grown over time in the use of the GT method in a field of research focusing on highly demanding conditions such as disaster management and military operations. We will discuss a new concept, namely, reflexive serendipity, which encompasses the conditions required for making discoveries in the interview analysis. These may be contextual aspects and the role of the researcher, which includes having an open mind and the necessary perseverance and discipline to be able to succeed with GT and serendipity.
Becoming a Swedish military ranger: a Grounded Theory study
In: Norma: Nordic journal for masculinity studies, Band 11, Heft 1, S. 34-51
ISSN: 1890-2146
Reflexive Serendipity. Grounded Theory and Serendipity in Disaster Management and Military Research
Grounded Theory (GT) is a research method that allows the researcher to make discoveries without a priori knowledge, and allows an open mind not an empty head. The use of this method is also desirable for serendipity to occur in the research process. This article therefore aims to chronologically present how serendipity has grown over time in the use of the GT method in a field of research focusing on highly demanding conditions such as disaster management and military operations. We will discuss a new concept, namely, reflexive serendipity, which encompasses the conditions required for making discoveries in the interview analysis. These may be contextual aspects and the role of the researcher, which includes having an open mind and the necessary perseverance and discipline to be able to succeed with GT and serendipity.
BASE
Reflexive serendipity : grounded theory and serendipity in disaster management and military research
Grounded Theory (GT) is a research method that allows the researcher to make discoveries withouta priori knowledge, and allows an open mind not an empty head. The use of this method is also desirablefor serendipity to occur in the research process. This article therefore aims to chronologically presenthow serendipity has grown over time in the use of the GT method in a field of research focusing onhighly demanding conditions such as disaster management and military operations. We will discussa new concept, namely, reflexive serendipity, which encompasses the conditions required for makingdiscoveries in the interview analysis. These may be contextual aspects and the role of the researcher,which includes having an open mind and the necessary perseverance and discipline to be able tosucceed with GT and serendipity.
BASE
Status incongruence revisited - associations with shame and mental well-being (GHQ)
Study purpose: Status incongruence has been related to poor health and all-cause mortality, and could be a growing public health problem due to changes in the labour market in later decades. Shaming experiences have been suggested as playing a part in the aetiology. Our aim was to study the risk for shaming experiences, pessimism, anxiety, depressive feelings, and poor mental well-being (GHQ) with a special focus on shame, in four status categories: negatively and positively incongruent individuals, and low-status and high-status congruent individuals. Method: Data comprised 14 854 working men and women from a regional sample of randomly selected respondents, 18-79 years. Logistic regression was used to study differences in risk for negative emotional outcomes. Results: The negative incongruent category persisted as the group most at risk for all negative emotional outcomes (OR 1.5-1.9; p<0.05-<0.001). When testing the risk for poor mental well-being among the status categories with and without shaming experiences, OR for all groups with shaming experiences were elevated. Among groups without shame, only the negative incongruent category remained at risk (OR 2.7; p<0.05) after adjustment. Conclusion: Negative incongruent status is associated with adverse emotional outcomes, among them shame, which is a previously unappreciated aspect of status incongruence. ; This is the author version of the following article:Johanna Lundberg, Margareta Kristenson and Bengt Starrin, Status incongruence revisited: associations with shame and mental wellbeing, 2009, SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH and ILLNESS, (31), 4, 478-493.which has been published in final form at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01148.xCopyright: Blackwell Publishing Ltdhttp://www.blackwellpublishing.com/
BASE
Solidarity in the neighbourhood, social support at work and psychosomatic health problems
In: Journal of Public Health, Band 17, Heft 4, S. 265-271
Aims: The aim of this study was to analyse the link between psychosocial factors in the neighbourhood and work environments, and psychosomatic health problems. Methods: The data were collected in the survey 'Life and Health', which was conducted in 2000 in six Swedish county councils. A total of 71,580 questionnaires were distributed to randomly selected individuals aged 18-79. A total of 46,636 respondents completed the questionnaire. This gives a response rate of around 65%. For the purpose of this study only gainfully employed individuals aged 18-64 are included, which gives a total of 22,164 individuals: 11,247 (50.7%) women and 10,917 (49.3%) men. Two scales were used to measure the psychosocial environments in the neighbourhood and at work. The link between these scales and psychosomatic health problems was analysed by using multinomial logistic regression. Results: The results show that both 'Psychosocial Neighbourhood Environment' (PNE) and 'Psychosocial Working Environment' (PWE), independently, are related to psychosomatic health problems. Hence, the health effects of social relations in the neighbourhood were not modified by the quality of social relations at work, or vice versa. The levels of psychosomatic health problems are highest for people experiencing a low degree of social solidarity in the neighbourhood and for those experiencing low degrees of supportive work relationships. Conclusion: The strong, but independent, effects of social factors related to the neighbourhood and to the workplace on psychosomatic health problems point to the importance of simultaneously considering social relations in different arenas in order to increase the knowledge of the connection between social relations and health.
Reflexive serendipity: Grounded theory and serendipity in disaster management and military research
In: 28-42 ; 12 ; Qualitative Sociology Review ; 3
Grounded Theory (GT) is a research method that allows the researcher to make discoveries without a priori knowledge, and allows an open mind not an empty head. The use of this method is also desirable for serendipity to occur in the research process. This article therefore aims to chronologically present how serendipity has grown over time in the use of the GT method in a field of research focusing on highly demanding conditions such as disaster management and military operations. We will discuss a new concept, namely, reflexive serendipity, which encompasses the conditions required for making discoveries in the interview analysis. These may be contextual aspects and the role of the researcher, which includes having an open mind and the necessary perseverance and discipline to be able to succeed with GT and serendipity.
BASE
Sense of coherence during unemployment
In: International journal of social welfare, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 107-116
ISSN: 1468-2397
The aim of this study was to investigate the relation between different forms of hardship during unemployment and the sense of coherence (SOC). These hardships were considered in the framework of the finances–shame model, which has been developed to help provide a greater understanding of why unemployment is so painful to some whilst others are hardly affected by it. The hypothesis in this study was that the greater the financial hardships during unemployment and the more a person has been subjected to shaming by others because they are unemployed, the lower his or her SOC will be, and vice versa. The empirical data were collected by means of a cross‐sectional survey of 1,249 unemployed people in a region in southern Sweden who at the time of the survey were engaged in some form of labour‐market training or workfare programme. The dropout rate was 23%. The results from the study lent strong support to the finances–shame model. Among those who were exposed to a greater degree of financial hardship and also had more shaming experiences, the mean SOC score was 42.14 for women and 42.41 for men. The corresponding figures for those facing a lesser degree of financial hardship and with fewer shaming experiences were 67.10 and 66.66 respectively, i.e. figures which are on a par with or somewhat higher than for population studies covering the whole population.
Ill health and social conditions amongst migrants and refugees—the case of Sweden
In: Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, Band 6, Heft 1, S. 75-83
ISSN: 1469-8412